This is something I reflect on sometimes. If you listen to old live recordings, I feel on average the big names back then played more wrong notes than the big names today. Yet at the same time, I often find older recordings to bemore exciting, on average, than new recordings.
This does not, of course, mean that I think more wong notes equals more exciting playing, but at the same time I wonder if pianists today spend more of their focus on making sure they don't make mistakes, and that something about the excitement and daring of the old school pianists is lost in the process.
For students, it can be tempting to use the idea of "I don't care about mistakes, I prioritize going for it and making it exciting" as an excuse for not practising or developing your technique properly, and this is not what I mean. I think the giants back then were very capable of playing everything, but in the heat of the moment they just slightly missed the right key. I think this is different from making a mistake due to not feeling in physical command or at ease at the instrument, which is more likely to be the case with students.
I think seeking to develop a solid, clean technique can coexist with taking risks, daring, and paying the price of slightly more wrong notes for the reward of more exciting playing - assuming you can play everything clean should you choose to. At least that's what I imagine is within the realm of possiblity for today's top professionals.
What do you guys think? Do professional pianists focus a bit too much on playing cleanly today, at the expense of other qualities? Or is this all in my head?
