Second to last post wins!!!!!!

[liszt-and-the-galops]

And what would you know about that?

I think he'd know a lot about that, considering he made the thread.

Edit: New page, yay.

[gasplamey]

That looks vaguely AI-generated...

And what do you care, are you some sort of luddite?

[gasplamey]

I think he'd know a lot about that, considering he made the thread.

And what does that have to do with the price of eggs in china?

[liszt-and-the-galops]

And what do you care, are you some sort of luddite?

No.
But AI-generated art is something that I'm generally opposed to, because the vast majority of it is trained off of the stolen artwork of real people.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

And what does that have to do with the price of eggs in china?

Nothing, but it has a lot to do with whether or not transitional knows how this thread works.

[gasplamey]

No.
But AI-generated art is something that I'm generally opposed to, because the vast majority of it is trained off of the stolen artwork of real people.

Well now you're being political.

[gasplamey]

Well now you're being political.

I won't stand for this!

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Well now you're being political.

Political:
Relating to the government or the public affairs of a country.
"a period of political and economic stability"

relating to the ideas or strategies of a particular party or group in politics.
"a decision taken for purely political reasons"

interested in or active in politics.
"I'm not very political"


The problem with AI-generated art is, according to the Oxford dictionary, not political.
You're just saying it is because believing in the problem goes against your prior beliefs.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Well now you're being political.

But fine, here's an apolitical statement.
Nazis are objectively good.
No discussion can be had from that.

Here's another one.
Nazis are objectively bad.
Just as apolitical as the previous statement.


Do you see the problem?

[gasplamey]

Political:
relating to the ideas or strategies of a particular party or group in politics.
"a decision taken for purely political reasons"

"AI-generated art = bad" relates to a particular party or group in politics.

[gasplamey]

But fine, here's an apolitical statement.
Nazis are objectively good.
No discussion can be had from that.

Here's another one.
Nazis are objectively bad.
Just as apolitical as the previous statement.


Do you see the problem?

What are you blabbering about?

[liszt-and-the-galops]

"AI-generated art = bad" relates to a particular party or group in politics.

Does it?

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Does it?

AFAIK the Democratic Party hasn't taken a stance on companies stealing art from actual artists to train their crappy AI models, and the Republican Party sure as hell doesn't give a damn what happens to artists because they think "none of them are white men and therefore none of them are people" (even though every part of that claim is factually incorrect but whatever they don't care about facts).

[transitional]

And what would you know about that?

That I can do whatever I want with my thread. I've already said this like 2 times.

[transitional]

Edit: New page, yay.

Nice. I thought I'd get there, but this page was going too fast today.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

I went ahead and checked because I was curious, and this new page was extra important. Explanation in the next post...

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Not counting the first page, here was the order of "new pages"
2. Liszt-and-the-Galops (me)
3. me
4. me
5. me
6. gasplamey
7. gasplamey
8. gasplamey
9. transitional
10. transitional
11. transitional
12. transitional
13. gasplamey.

Totals:
me: 4 (2-5)
gasplamey: 4 (6-8, 13)
transitional: 4 (9-12)

This means that whoever got the new page on page 14 would take the lead for most new pages.
So, not only is this my first new page since page 5, it also means that I know have the most new pages on this thread out of anyone who has made a new page on this thread!

Now I need to get the next one... and the one after that... and the one after that...
Uh oh.

[gasplamey]

That I can do whatever I want with my thread. I've already said this like 2 times.

No you can't.
You've started something you cannot control.

[gasplamey]

Not counting the first page, here was the order of "new pages"
2. Liszt-and-the-Galops (me)
3. me
4. me
5. me
6. gasplamey
7. gasplamey
8. gasplamey
9. transitional
10. transitional
11. transitional
12. transitional
13. gasplamey.

Totals:
me: 4 (2-5)
gasplamey: 4 (6-8, 13)
transitional: 4 (9-12)

This means that whoever got the new page on page 14 would take the lead for most new pages.
So, not only is this my first new page since page 5, it also means that I know have the most new pages on this thread out of anyone who has made a new page on this thread!

Now I need to get the next one... and the one after that... and the one after that...
Uh oh.

You do your statistics while I focus on winning.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

You do your statistics while I focus on winning.

I don't need your help to do both.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

No you can't.
You've started something you cannot control.

transitional can lock the thread whenever he wants to, you know.

[gasplamey]

I don't need your help to do both.

Nah, shut up.
Go back to looking at furry porn like you seem to always do.

[gasplamey]

transitional can lock the thread whenever he wants to, you know.

Threadmaker can't lock the thread.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Nah, shut up.
Go back to looking at furry porn like you seem to always do.

We've had this whole conversation like four times at this point.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

We've had this whole conversation like four times at this point.

I've presented hard evidence refuting your points each time, but you just refuse to acknowledge reality.
I'm not going to reply on this topic anymore. Keep saying it all you want, but it's not going to make it true.

[gasplamey]

We've had this whole conversation like four times at this point.

Just come clean. It'll feal better.

[gasplamey]

Keep saying it all you want, but it's not going to make it true.

I suppose that's accurate.
Saying something over and over isn't going to change the status of a true fact.

[transitional]

I suppose that's accurate.
Saying something over and over isn't going to change the status of a true fact.

Making up random stuff on the basis of random comment section comments also doesn't make it true.

[transitional]

Also, congrats for holding onto a win for a few days without liszt-and-the-galops noticing.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Also, congrats for holding onto a win for a few days without liszt-and-the-galops noticing.

F_ck.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

F_ck.

Well, let's fix that.

[Siberian Husky]

what the *** is happening in this thread

[gasplamey]

what the *** is happening in this thread

The new gaurd having a bit of fun, like you and your pals used to back in the old threads like "ranting about the youth of today."

[gasplamey]

The new gaurd having a bit of fun, like you and your pals used to back in the old threads like "ranting about the youth of today."

Move on, bomer.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

The new gaurd having a bit of fun, like you and your pals used to back in the old threads like "ranting about the youth of today."

Move on, bomer.

Gasplamey, you literally have less than 250 posts. Just having joined the forum relatively recently doesn't make you a member of the "new guard."
The "new guard," assuming you mean the newest PS members who are prominent members of conversation on here, would be me, transitional, and few others. You are definitely not included in that group.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Your more recent behavior has also been something of note, gasplamey. You used to be a kid who looked like a decent human being who occasionally did something stupid, like most kids.
Now, you seem like you're out to "get" people who you don't like, and you've been parroting right-wing statements every now and then.
Is everything okay?

[gasplamey]

Gasplamey, you literally have less than 250 posts. Just having joined the forum relatively recently doesn't make you a member of the "new guard."
The "new guard," assuming you mean the newest PS members who are prominent members of conversation on here, would be me, transitional, and few others. You are definitely not included in that group.

No.

[gasplamey]

Now, you seem like you're out to "get" people who you don't like, and you've been parroting right-wing statements every now and then.

What on earth are you talking about? You think I'm a pro-Russia or pro-Hitler MAGA dude?
Or is everyone who isn't a commie a far-right nazi nutjob to you?

[liszt-and-the-galops]

What on earth are you talking about? You think I'm a pro-Russia or pro-Hitler MAGA dude?
Or is everyone who isn't a commie a far-right nazi nutjob to you?

For one thing, I'm a socialist, not a communist...

[liszt-and-the-galops]

What on earth are you talking about? You think I'm a pro-Russia or pro-Hitler MAGA dude?

And no, I never said you were a fascist or pro-fascist.
However, I did point out that I'd noticed a significant change in you from before you forgot your password.
In June, you didn't talk about politics much, and the one time I remember it coming up you openly said you would kill Donald Trump if you had the means.
Now, you constantly try to get into arguments (especially over politics) and have seemed to claim that stealing copyrighted artwork off the internet is fine, and the Musk never actually did a Nazi salute. You've claimed that I'm a zoophile in at least four threads because of something false that you heard about a video game that I like(?). And just now you attacked another person (Siberian Husky) for no reason.
Clearly, something's changed. I'm wondering what.

[gasplamey]

For one thing, I'm a socialist, not a communist...

So you admit to supporting genocides of those who you disagree with via concentration camps and whatnot?

[gasplamey]

And no, I never said you were a fascist or pro-fascist.

Then what's this?

you've been parroting right-wing statements

the one time I remember it coming up you openly said you would kill Donald Trump if you had the means.

You're insinuating that I broke the law and said I would kill someone just because I disagree with them, which is obviously not true.

Now, you constantly try to get into arguments (especially over politics) and have seemed to claim that stealing copyrighted artwork off the internet is fine, and the Musk never actually did a Nazi salute.

Where did I say either of those things?

You've claimed that I'm a zoophile in at least four threads because of something false that you heard about a video game that I like(?).

Oh, NOW you want to fess up about your animal fetish?

And just now you attacked another person (Siberian Husky) for no reason.

It wasn't without reason.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

So you admit to supporting genocides of those who you disagree with via concentration camps and whatnot?

What the f_ck are you talking about?
Explain to me how saying that socialism and communism are different things means that I support genocide?

Then what's this?[/font

I'm not sure what you're point is here. Your "proof" that I called you a fascist is that I said that you'd made a couple of right-wing comments?
Do you think those mean the same thing?

You're insinuating that I broke the law and said I would kill someone just because I disagree with them, which is obviously not true.[/font]

You said this on Last Post Wins:

He.
And I wish I could [shoot Trump], but I'm the only person in this country who doesn't own a gun.

And I'm not sure how that amounts to "breaking the law."

Continued in next post...

[liszt-and-the-galops]

]Where did I say either of those things?

Here's this whole chain of replies:

The image implies that Musk is a nazi, when in reality he's only a far right lunatic.

In what way [was it] NOT a nazi salute? Also, before you say that he didn't mean it or that it was an "accident," he did it TWICE. In a ROW. The second one was directly towards Trump.

Who said anything about the salute?

You said that Musk isn't a nazi, so I pointed to evidence that Musk is a nazi.

Did I at any point deny that he's a far-right lunatic?

We aren't talking about that, though, are we?
We're talking about whether or not Musk is a nazi.

We are indeed.
...
And I'm saying agree to disagree on this.

And here's the AI art thing:

No.
But AI-generated art is something that I'm generally opposed to, because the vast majority of it is trained off of the stolen artwork of real people.

Well now you're being political.

Oh, NOW you want to fess up about your animal fetish?[/font]

ATP you're just trying to ragebait on this topic lmao.

It wasn't without reason.

What reason could you possibly have?

[gasplamey]

What the f_ck are you talking about?
Explain to me how saying that socialism and communism are different things means that I support genocide?

The USSR and Maoist China didn't commit genocides and/or weren't communist?

Here's this whole chain of replies:
And here's the AI art thing:

And where in those comments did I say that "stealing copyrighted artwork off the internet is fine, and that Elon Musk never did a Nazi salute"?

[gasplamey]

What reason could you possibly have?

My reasoning exceeds the understanding of your feeble animal mind:
furries are pedophiles and have animal fetishes, which is not okay.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

The USSR and Maoist China didn't commit genocides and/or weren't communist?

What does that have to do with what we were talking about?

And where in those comments did I say that "stealing copyrighted artwork off the internet is fine, and that Elon Musk never did a Nazi salute"?

What do you mean? I quoted the conversations where you said/heavily implied those things.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

furries are pedophiles and have animal fetishes, which is not okay.

1. That's a gross overgeneralization
2. That's extremely inaccurate
3. That has literally nothing at all to do with your behavior towards Siberian Husky
Do you actually have a "reason" other than just the fact that they joined the forum a long time ago?

[Siberian Husky]

....now kiss....

[liszt-and-the-galops]

....now kiss....

I'm more interested in killing him.