Speaking of which, America blew up the twin towers just as the planes were colliding. There is much evidence to suggest this.
I always found it strange the terrorists were able to hit the pentagon.But beware, that flash movie attempts to use propaganda techniques. Notice the Hitler speech at the beginning. I wouldn't trust the 'facts' they state.I think the only room for discussion is: did they know it was going to happen and did they let the terrorists execute the attack. And 'they' can mean alot of things. If they did know, which is still unlikely, I don't think Bush himself knew.It seems to me that both the Clinton administration as the Bush administration didn't really care about terrorist attacks.
So what, the Pentagon just has cable spools laying around the yard ?
I didn't quite understand what was so significant about the spools. How are spools of cable related to missiles?
Guys, I'm pretty sure this was just a joke.It's just showing (I think) that those things which people may assume is part of a plane is just some construction materials (remember, the pentagon was under renovation at that time.)
Take for instance, when the twin towers were hit, Pres. Bush was reading to children. We have a video tape that shows some security whispering in his ear what is happening. He sits for a second, then begins to read again, but quickly finishes. Because he doesn't get up immediately and run around in panic he must of knew it was happening and probably even did the acts himself.
Er... actually, I watched the movie and have understood this passage in quite another way. I think, this should just show that Mr. Bush is an incapable President because he does not even react for 10 minutes or something when the US are hit. The movie, as I can recall, did not state in any place that the Bush administration has caused the named attacks...Still, I think Fahrenheit was more or less abunch of propagandistic and suggestive movie clips, I was quite disappointed by the way the "facts" were presented... Not very serious, for me...
https://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/Any opinions?
I hate to believe, or take seriosuly, any such third-third-party reports on major issues like these. 1) Motive behind these clips are unknown, which could mean any sort of spin on propoganda.2) Any number of facts could have been missed, only adding to deception and eventually, rumors.3) Poorly made movies like these have little actual value, other than the obvious entertainment value (and to get you to start thinking on your own).Aside from that, it was interesting to hear a new take on the pentagon attack (no, I had never heard of this particular conspiracy theory) but lacked any real substantial value.
Aside from that, it was interesting to hear a new take on the pentagon attack (no, I had never heard of this particular conspiracy theory) but lacked any real substantial value.
A poll a German magazine did a few months ago showed that 20% of Germans believe that Bush had some level of involvement in the 9/11 attacks. There also was a best selling book in France about how no plane hit the Pentagon.
er...Having read this thread after a couple of weeks, I am still asking: "what is your opinion?"1. Did a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon and "vaporised" on impact as the official version would have us believe? If so, how to explain the evidence on the video?2. Or is your opinion that that video is fake and has benn "doctored" to elliminate any evidence of wreckage, damage to the lawn, etc.?
Topic: Pentagon strike 