It's difficult for the jury to choose 12 people out of 35 to move forward, and frankly, I think they've done a wonderful job for such a daunting task. I certainly disagree with a few of the pianists they chose, but all things considered, it's still an extremely talented, diverse group. That they didn't choose a few of my own favorites to move on doesn't mean their overall decision was bad. Unless you dislike the entire group, it's better just to accept their choices and move on - they aren't perfect, and they don't pretend to be, but they do what they feel is best.
Poetry and instrospection are exactly what got people like Roberto Plano and Joyce Yang (for her Bach) into the semifinals.
There are certainly differences between pianists, though it takes a good deal of experience to start differentiating between them. Why do you think some pianists like Gould or Arrau were so popular, where others with even better technique still remained unknown? 100 years ago, there were still many, many pianists (and this applies to other musicians and artists as well) barely scraping together a living while some very small number ever made it big.
So far, pretty much everybody's made
some mistakes, but that's certainly not the most important thing. Piano isn't about athletics, it's about music. My favorite out of the 35, Chu-Fang Huang, missed some chords at the end of Rachmaninoff's 2nd Sonata, but the performance was still magnificent, and I wouldn't've found it too much better with the right notes. It's about the sound and overall effect the pianist produces, not necessarily accuracy. (Of course, it's not
good to miss notse, and there are some places where missing notes sounds a lot worse than others, but perfect accuracy is less important than creativity, and phrasing, and dynamics, and rubato, etc etc).
I found Mamriev to be somewhat bland, despite his technique. Look at how many others in the competition have equal (or even better) technique, with the addition of more honest musicianship - I believe that's why Mamriev didn't make it. I did indeed wish Akapova moved up, but again, the jury's decision is a hard one and perhaps they didn't find her performance as compelling as I did.
So there's my two cents...
