Nothing is overrated...playing the piano is #$%&/()$ difficult !!
Ok, I see what you're saying, but you can't deny that on the forum whenever certain pieces come up someone posts about how they are either ridiculous for learning the piece or that it is insane they should not learn it(and alot of the time, alot of people agree and/or start flaming), or atleast, thats what it has been in my experience with people I know, and sometimes even on this forum. There are other open minded people of course, but this is what I mean by "overrated". I would just like to hear some similiar stories about mastering some technical aspect/goal that you didn't expect to do, can be inspiring you know.
I think Jeux D'eau intimidates a lot more people than it should. It fit well under my hands; it should fit well under yours.
Which one do you mean Liszt's or Ravel's? imo Ravel is more challenging.
Jeux d'eau is Ravel - jeux de la villa deste is Liszt
Fantaisie-ImpromptuCase closed.
Not quite: Liszt: Jeux d'eau à la Villa d'Este (sometimes simply referred to as "Jeux d'eau"), but I suppose thatRavel was meant anyway.
What would be good preperation for the Ravel piece?
I'm gonna say the OC - coz I haven't played it nor anyone else I think on this forum and therefore we're all at a position to say it's overated
Since someone doesn't know anything about the piece it means that one should comment on it regardless of the obvious total ignorance?It's like saying that someone can perform heart sugery because they haven't tried before and thus do not know anything about the complecations of such a procedure.
think quite a lot of music is overated in terms of proffessionals being able to play it because I think that professionals can play most stuff
But what I want you to get at is that the technical difficulty is the most direct, up front challenge everyone faces in difficult pieces (depending on what you define as difficult). So-called musicality is overrated, because everyone has a different interpretation to some extent.