Stats

[morningstar]

I was checking out the little messages at the bottom of the page and found this: 370479 Posts in 29953 Topics by 28701 Members.
So therefore every member has created an average 1.04 topics each and has posted an average of 12.9 times each. Sorry I was sooooo bored at TAFE.
Just something random to think about.

[communist]

pianistimo has almost one third of the total posts 

[morningstar]

Wait...really? 123493 posts? Insane! lol

[communist]

I KNOW RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[morningstar]

Woah. Maybe I should check every active member and add their post stats together and see what I come up with.

[tanman]

I was checking out the little messages at the bottom of the page and found this: 370479 Posts in 29953 Topics by 28701 Members.
So therefore every member has created an average 1.04 topics each and has posted an average of 12.9 times each. Sorry I was sooooo bored at TAFE.
Just something random to think about.

  
you must have REALLY been bored... I'd really expect gwk to do this. 

and we have pianistimo to thank for most of the posts even though to thal they are mostly worthless pieces of junk. 

[tanman]

so since pianistimo's posts are considered junk by thal and other people post a considerable amount of junk, then does that mean that pianoforum is really only worth half of what it is now?

[morningstar]

 
you must have REALLY been bored... I'd really expect gwk to do this. 

and we have pianistimo to thank for most of the posts even though to thal they are mostly worthless pieces of junk. 

Yep. Still am really bored...

[morningstar]

so since pianistimo's posts are considered junk by thal and other people post a considerable amount of junk, then does that mean that pianoforum is really only worth half of what it is now?

I'm not even certain half of the posts would be substantial.

[qoppa]

pianistimo has almost one third of the total posts 

Not quite...  Try 1/30th.

[communist]

Not quite...  Try 1/30th.

i though it said 37069 

[G.W.K]

This subject was already brought up by other members. In fact, thal pointed out that the statistics are not always accurate and I too have noticed that.

Don't believe everything you see!

G.W.K

[m19834]

Don't believe everything you see!

G.W.K

My motto is :  "Don't believe anything !"

[G.W.K]

My motto is :  "Don't believe anything !"

Not really a good method to adopt.

G.W.K

[m19834]

Not really a good method to adopt.

G.W.K

I don't believe you.

[G.W.K]

I don't believe you.

No, you wouldn't...would you? 

G.W.K

[morningstar]

This subject was already brought up by other members. In fact, thal pointed out that the statistics are not always accurate and I too have noticed that.

Don't believe everything you see!

G.W.K

Oh. So I guess this whole thread is useless then isn't it? lol

[tanman]

Oh. So I guess this whole thread is useless then isn't it? lol

oh well... then it's just another thread that litters pianostreet...

[morningstar]

oh well... then it's just another thread that litters pianostreet...

One of about 28500...what's with the reputation thing?

[tanman]

idk
but I feel like giving you a plus. lol

[morningstar]

idk
but I feel like giving you a plus. lol

One for tan...

[tanman]

One for tan...

 

[db05]

idk
but I feel like giving you a plus. lol

One for tan...

Hey, no bias, guys. 

[tanman]

Hey, no bias, guys. 

 
I think morningstar has the highest reputation as of now...

[morningstar]

Lol
db has the same...

[db05]

Lol
db has the same...

Looks like nils isn't too happy with the rep thing. The arrows are gone.

Edit: Oh I get it, nils.     

[G.W.K]

Looks like nils isn't too happy with the rep thing. The arrows are gone.

Edit: Oh I get it, nils.     

Arrows? I don't actually see a reputation number...not even in our profiles. Hmmm 

G.W.K

[db05]

Arrows? I don't actually see a reputation number...not even in our profiles. Hmmm 

G.W.K

The arrows were replaced with yes/no at the bottom. If you don't have a number, it means it's 0 or negative.

[G.W.K]

The arrows were replaced with yes/no at the bottom. If you don't have a number, it means it's 0 or negative.

I bet you have been giving me negatives! Can I ask what I've done wrong? I try to mend things with lucy and get insulted and YOU AGREE WITH HER!?! Or is it the debates with pianistimo?

I am really confused about people on this site now-a-days.

G.W.K

[db05]

I bet you have been giving me negatives! Can I ask what I've done wrong? I try to mend things with lucy and get insulted and YOU AGREE WITH HER!?! Or is it the debates with pianistimo?

I am really confused about people on this site now-a-days.

G.W.K

Now don't get paranoid. It might be zero and no one has bothered to give you plusses yet.

Am baffled too, as I got a couple points. Did I say something informative lately?  I guess my thread was helpful?

(Edited for clarity.)

[G.W.K]

Now don't get paranoid. It might be zero and no one has bothered to give you plusses yet.

Am baffled too, as I got a couple points. Did I say something informative lately?

True. But you still haven't mentioned your un-clear reasons for agreeing to someone who attacks another member...which is what I have been trying to point out!...when they are trying to re-build a sensible relationship.

G.W.K

[db05]

True. But you still haven't mentioned your un-clear reasons for agreeing to someone who attacks another member...which is what I have been trying to point out!...when they are trying to re-build a sensible relationship.

G.W.K

Sorry. I did say sometimes. Good luck with the relationship.

[G.W.K]

Sorry. I did say sometimes. Good luck with the relationship.

I doubt I will be able to establish anything whilst she remains fixed on causing arguments.

G.W.K

[db05]

I doubt I will be able to establish anything whilst she remains fixed on causing arguments.

G.W.K

Oh. Giving up now?

[G.W.K]

Oh. Giving up now?

Secretly, I gave up ages ago. LOL

G.W.K

[morningstar]

Secretly, I gave up ages ago. LOL

G.W.K

Not so much of a secret now is it? lol
and db some people are actually capable of being neutral. I actually gave GWK a positive! That alone should prove my point.
Just messin wit ya GWK

[G.W.K]

I actually gave GWK a positive!

Wouldn't make much difference, I'm still either 0 or negative. No one can speak their opinion because if they do, everyone begins "negativing" you! LOL

G.W.K

[morningstar]

Wouldn't make much difference, I'm still either 0 or negative. No one can speak their opinion because if they do, everyone begins "negativing" you! LOL

G.W.K

Therefore those with any sort of integrity will be in negatives. And pianistimo.

[G.W.K]

Therefore those with any sort of integrity will be in negatives. And pianistimo.

More than likely. And those who just come on here to argue with others (remind you of anyone?)

G.W.K

[morningstar]

More than likely. And those who just come on here to argue with others (remind you of anyone?)

G.W.K

I have no idea what you mean. *mock offended look*

[G.W.K]

I have no idea what you mean. *mock offended look*

Not you. Others...

G.W.K

[morningstar]

Not you. Others...

G.W.K

Ahhh.

[G.W.K]

Ahhh.

Glad to see that we have finally reached understanding.

G.W.K

[db05]

Glad to see that we have finally reached understanding.

G.W.K

Oh i see some relationships here are working out just fine. 

[G.W.K]

Oh i see some relationships here are working out just fine. 

LOL

G.W.K

[morningstar]

Oh i see some relationships here are working out just fine. 

Say wha?

[G.W.K]

Say wha?

She was addressing me, don't bother trying to understand.

G.W.K

[morningstar]

Ooh this could be interesting LOL. Spill!

[db05]

Ooh this could be interesting LOL. Spill!

I meant GWK and you.

[G.W.K]

I meant GWK and you.

And she only was because db05 and I were having a conversation regarding another member a few days ago. Please do not persist. It was not you, and you don't need to know who or why.

G.W.K