I don't currently have the time to do so; I will try to do something like that this weekend or something.
Here, however, are a list of issues on which they do NOT agree, or did not agree with in the past (for as much as Hillary's apologies are issued, I can't believe her on a single one with how much corporate money she takes), just off the top of my head:
- War in Iraq
- Defense of Marriage Act (anti gay marriage bill which she was for until 2013)
- Death Penalty
- Repealing of Glass Stegall (She was for it, Bernie against it)
- Trans Pacific Partnership, which she lobbied for 45 times
- NAFTA, another horrible free trade deal
- Police brutality/monitoring
- NSA Surveillance
- Corporate welfare
- Corporate taxes/tax evasion (Hillary was directly involved with the Panama Papers)
- Breaking up/harder regulations on Wall StreetNot as much as you might think. Look at opinion polls; the overwhelming majority of even Republicans want clean elections and background checks for purchasing of weapons, and the majority of Americans want universal education & healthcare, detest NSA spying, want higher taxes on the rich, etc.
The only reason Republicans are still around is because they know very well how to sell ideas to where people will like you just enough to keep you in office.
That as president, he would HAVE to compromise somewhere. But he would fight much, MUCH harder for what he believes than Hillary would or Obama did. Both of them concede up front; case in point, Obamacare. Obama said that, had the votes been there, he would've preferred single payer. As it turns out, they were, but he came to the table with an idea taken straight from the Heritage Foundation (a right wing think tank) which they proposed under Nixon as an alternative to single payer.
While Bernie undoubtedly won't get everything he wants, he'll get a lot more done than Hillary.
You say: I don't currently have the time to do so; I will try to do something like that this weekend or something.
Great IF you have time!
You say: I can't believe her on a single one with how much corporate money she takes.
With that reasoning, Donald Trump would be a great president since he is new to politics and has been self-funding. TRY to not allow her corporate money to over influence your thinking. Obama took in lots of corporate $ and I don’t think it influenced his policy. Example: Dodd-Frank act.
Just grabbing one on your list that I have actually thought about not too much: Police brutality/monitoring. To me, the most important PRACTICAL thing that can be done is mandatory police body cameras, and I believe Clinton is for this. As you look at issues, you need to consider that Hillary may be forming opinions based on what can ACTUALLY be done and enacted in law, as opposed to what would ideally be done. Look at her website to see how she feels about matters, don’t only look at past voting and consider that some votes she made may have been done as a compromise.
You say: Not as much as you might think. Look at opinion polls; the overwhelming majority of even Republicans want clean elections and background checks for purchasing of weapons, and the majority of Americans want universal education & healthcare, detest NSA spying, want higher taxes on the rich, etc.
Getting these passed into LAW with the current make-up of congress is impossible at this time. Bernie is as far left as Cruz is far right in my current opinion listening to discussions on Fox news, CNN and MSNBC, etc, etc. I listen to all sides. Listening only to MSNBC, I may have a different opinion. Again, I would vote for Bernie without ANY hesitation of he were the nominee.
You say: The only reason Republicans are still around is because they know very well how to sell ideas to where people will like you just enough to keep you in office.
Fact is I believe Republicans and Republican ideas (not counting Trump) will be around and a very significant force for many years to come. Our country is greatly divided at this point and we need to keep from growing further apart.
You say: That as president, he would HAVE to compromise somewhere. But he would fight much, MUCH harder for what he believes than Hillary would or Obama did.
I have little doubt that Ted Cruz is as passionate about his ideas for saving our country as Bernie Sanders is about his ideas. What if Ted Cruz were president and we use your wording but with NAMES CHANGED:
That as president, TED CRUZ would HAVE to compromise somewhere. But he would fight much, MUCH harder for what he believes than Jeb Bush or John Kasich.
How would Ted Cruz fight much, MUCH harder to actually get his way? He might shut down the government. After all, he is correct in his thinking and this is for the good of our country.