This is so ridiculous. Let's end this crap right now.
1.
Great pianists need great talent. Wanting to be a great pianist and working 12 hours a day will not make you a great pianist. Some pianists are just more gifted than others.
2. a
Great pianists need great techniques. No kidding. Moiseiwitsch, Richter...etc all had complete mastery over the instrument.
2. b.
Great pianists need great discipline, great instruction - or both.
What's holding back
Asian any pianists from achieving the "greatness" of the great 20th century masters?
Nothing - except time, culture, and tradition. As I've said, I think that world culture is less piano oriented than it was a century ago, and as a result, much valuable tradition has been lost. Josef Hofmann redux is probably trading stocks in New York right now. Rachmaninov reincarnate? Operating on your heart.
What's the deal with Asian pianists? As has been said, piano playing is a relatively new phenomenon in Asian countries and it's natural that the teaching practices will mature over time.
...and it should be noted that schoenberg3 is a really good pianist. Let's say for the sake of argument that he is as talented as Moiseiwitsch. Moiseiwitsh did not study for SATs, APs, IBs, or advanced mathematics for the prospective medical practices dweeb.

. Benno knew from really early on that his life's calling was the concert performer. It's all about opportunity cost. I suspect schoenberg3 is in the same situation as many other talented young pianists today.
We just don't live in the 19th century anymore.
...Though I'll admit I can tolerate saps like Kissin if it means not being crippled by polio at age 4.
