But I personally wouldn't subordinate the so much larger early sonatas to them.
I couldn't say, but I consider Alkan's op39no4 to be perfect.
Funny, i find most Alkan to be boring as hell, including his Op. 39. My vote goes to Beethoven's last three sonatas, and the mature works of Bach, if they count as piano...
Alkan is, I think, one of the most inspired composers.
It's common knowledge Brahms had a notorious dislike for the instrument.
Funny, i find most Alkan to be boring as hell, including his Op. 39.
Does anybody agree with me?
i totally agree, the beethoven late sonatas are just astonishing. but however in my own personal opinion, brahms is just something else completely. alkan doesnt touch it. neither for that matter does chopin, liszt, rach, medtner, or most other composers.
He's a grinder. To be frank, i don't find that inspiring
What is a grinder anyway?
However as great as his Op.117 to Op.119 are there can't really be any comparison between these sets of pieces or suites(if I may call it that) to Sonatas(for example.) They are mini masterpieces but they don't really compare to Chopin's Etude op.10 and 25 or let alone Beethoven's Sonata no.32 op.111 and the Liszt Sonata in terms of greatness and influence to piano writing.
Well, influential, for me is how a person can affect his contemporaries and more so the next generation. It is hard for me to define in precise terms(alas, my command of the English language is limited) so let me just give examples. Liszt for example, was able to foreshadow the emergence of impressionism(with the piece jeux d'eau a la villa de este), the use of leitmotiv(later used by Wagner in his operas), the creation of the symphonic poem, the Bagatelle without Tonality foreshadowed the atonal movement, and of course the "invention" of the piano recital. Chopin took the nocturnes to greater heigher and deeper depths as one might say, he is also the first composer to write Ballades and Scherzo's as seperate pieces(as opposed to being mere sonata movements), he revolutionized the writing of studies and can be credited of making the first etude de concerts(eventually inspiring Liszt, Schumann ang countless others).Beethoven, you know how influential he is, whatever influential means.
116 to 119. Taking the fantasies out is like chopping out the first 12 P&F from WTC.BTW, WTC is a greater achievement than 111-119, as much as I love Brahms.Play them both.
Well, the Brahms' solo pieces I have on my piano mostly turn out to be the Variations, Op.21 and 24 in particular (Op.35 is a bit dry as well as fiendish).
So to me, Schubert's D960 befits the description - a substantial composition written in the composer's most mature period (well...) and capturing so much human essence.ps. I'm surprised again that op10no2 mentioned the op. 116, which I agree is a fantastic work you shouldn't omit as among Brahms' greatest for piano...
I still can't get over how gorgeous and poignant the 118/6 is... and the usage of dies irae... incredible.
Ohh wow I wasn't even aware of that but now that I think of this piece--of course! thanks for the hint!