By the way, what is the name of the software you are talking about?? I want to find one but I can't
The name of the software is Akhoff Composer.
Quote from: rohansahai on March 24, 2005, 11:40:03 PM
Have you heard Richter playing tha prelude? if you have, i guess you would've noticed the way each and every dynamic is just copy-pasted.
By the way, musicians ARE supposed to be jealous by birth, nature, genetics, EVERYTHING !! But since i'm not one, i guess i'll make my point : There are many many better pianists around than Mei-Ting.
P.S. I have a software which can make attempts to convert an mp3 recording to MIDI format (not very accurately but it can do a fair job), and its job with meiting's recordings were almost perfect !
Whoa, what's this? Detective Dipshit at work? So lemme get this straight: Just because you can't play your way through a piece of used toiletpaper meiting's recordings are fake? You've got the brain of a 4 year-old boy who I'm sure, was glad to be rid of it. So before you start "using" this brain you might wanna do some homework first. And when your IQ reaches 50, I advise you to sell.
In trying to be really sarcastic, you've accidentally made yourself pretty incomprehensible. By saying "copy pasted" i never meant that they are actually copy-pasted using computer tricks....what i mean is that his tempo, the articulations, and his entire picture of this piece exactly matches Richter's, but still does not have the poise of his playing. He's apparently tried to copy his style, on this occasion... or maybe influenced a little bit too much in this piece.
When we listen to any pianist playing, after a sufficient number of pieces, we tend to get an exact image of his style, and his entire approach to piano playing. For instance, you can impulsively identify or make fairly accurate guesses to the identity of the pianist when some unknown recording of his is played, simply judging by his approach and style. However in Mei-Ting's case.. i've listened to his rach preludes (all of them), the hammerklavier, the bartok sonata and some of the other pieces, and I find them as a jumbled up set of pretty average interpretations. There is no personal element in his playing and that is the reason why despite his phenomenal technique, I do not really like his playing......it does not move me, it does not hum itself in my brain after i switch off the recordings.
I think Mei Tings Rach preludes are insanely good. His op. 23 no. 9 is untoucheable. I tell all my friends he's the future of piano.
Rob
EXACTLY !! You have unconsciously made my point ! When you think of great renderings of these great works (the rach preludes): Richter, Ashkenazy etc., you first think about their D major, G major, G minor, G sharp minor and the other preludes. However in Mei-Ting's case, you tend to remember his op. 23 no. 9 (which i agree, is untouchable). simply shows that it is his technique which is most impressive.
Anyway, its just my opinion, you always have the right to disagree !!!