Total Members Voted: 78
Don't Vote!!! Its a trap
I know that you have good intentions, but this is just an open invite to the "usual suspects" to argue from here to eternity again
God will still be here whether we vote him in or out.
Does God exist?
Indeed he does. In the heads of certain people.
God will still be here whether we vote him in or out. personally, i'd rather vote for Him than any other governmental official. but, in the end, we're the ones on the hot seat. thankfully, our new honda accord has gotten me used to those.
Greetings.Can you prove it? After all of the arguments I can't believe that you still post the same thing. One thing is to believe a concept, another is to keep on posting it.
So he probably has no need for petty and basic human processes such as thinkingTherefore god doesn't thinkSo he must not exist[[]]
Lord, mycrabface, look what you've started again. I'm gonna have your head in a pickle barrel.
I would have voted, if there was a "I don't know"
PLEASE! Why debate the issue - don't you people know never to talk about religion and politics!
God is a perfect and omnipotent beingSo he probably has no need for petty and basic human processes such as thinkingTherefore god doesn't thinkSo he must not exist
Haha, do you realise there is actually an argument that claims that because god is perfect she must exist? Because if a 'perfect' thing does not exist it is imperfect. So perfect things must exist or they aren't perfect. And god is perfect, so she exists.
My sister still had not come; thoughts rose again to my head. The smell of seaweed and salt of the water, my sister’s laughter and her presence, wishing so much that she were different but, most importantly wishing that she were real.
So I could scare myself in broad daylight, on the open hillside, by imagining unintelligible sounds; and my imagination was both original and fertile in the invention of such. As I grew older, I almost outgrew them. Yet sometimes one awful dread would seize me-that, perhaps, the prophetic power manifest in the gift of second sight, which, according to the testimony of my old nurse, had belonged to several of my ancestors, had been in my case transformed in kind without losing its nature, transferring its abode from the sight to the hearing, whence resulted its keenness, and my fear and suffering.
Of course there's a God. Where the h*** do you think you came from? Dah...John
I came from inside a vagina, where did you come from?
Why do all these threads have to turn into atheist threads? Darn atheists are always trying to force their beliefs on us. John
I think most of them aren't really atheists! they just like to argue, when it comes down to the end of their life(if not before) or if they have a major illness, they will probably change their minds.
I'm an atheist and I hate arguingWether it is better to accept the truth (or what is more probable to be like it) and live with it or to live an illusion and embrace a deity that promises you comfort is a phylosophical question worthy of a discussion of it's ownPersonally, I think all of us would believe mostly anything that would give us hope when faced with total despair no matter how silly or illogical that thing isBelief in god brings you comfort and gives you hope in desperate situations, that I think everyone agrees from the most devout to the most skepticMan craves the illusion of control and religion is a way to provide people with some measure of control over uncontrollable things, it gives them hope...It's still an illusion though... Like I said, if it is worth it or not is a very interesting question with possibly no answer at allAnd there I go ranting... (sigh) I gotta ease on the phylosophy[[]]
it's an illusion to you! not to me. to me it's fact.
it was I -- PIANISTIMO!! O tempora! O mores! O, Indeed!!!!
I was flown in by a stork.Thal
But you can't run civilizations on faith. People understandably want scientific assurances, such as aerodynamics -- for one example -- that airplanes can actually fly. Would you board one, and risk your life, solely on faith? I doubt it. You might board one when you see that millions have flown successfully and not been killed, but would you board one otherwise? No.
I was alwasy taught the rule ' never discuss religion and politics' was only for discussion in polite company.
Of course in the early days of aviation, there was no millions that had sucessfully flown nor a widespread understanding of aerodynamics. So I guess that the first air travellers must have boarded the flight in a spirit more of faith than science. Or maybe they just had faith in science. Either way, it wasn't through experience, but being prepared to trust that it seemed more likely that the thing would fly, than certainty that it would.