So you believe all the fluff about how we're supposed to eat lots of whole grains, fruits, vegetables, and avoid fat and cholesterol?...
i said nothing of the sort. just that the blanket statements in their attempt to simplify a complex concept leave so much out that it only serves to confuse.
i made it a point not to get into pissing contests over this stuff a long time ago (sometime between wrapping up some of my formal graduate biochemistry and biomedical sciences (molecular cell bio , etc) studies and a successful run for a couple of years in the athletic strength and conditioning and physique competitor coaching and consulting realm), interestingly, i never had a situation where the stuff that worked for performance and aesthetics didn't land them in a healthier place too (less inflammation, decreased autoimmuse issues, etc).
i didn't take issue with your premise which ultimately does work for a lot of people especially if their insulin and leptin signaling pathways are funky, but i have had to help repair my fair share of 'broken' metabolisms from clients that had done chronic low card dieting just cause they thought it was the way to go.
my approach is firmly steeped in evolutionary biology, sound proven and documented physiolgoy, and basic biochemistry, where there are gaps it is usually backed by strong anectotal evidence and i never confuse correlation with causality.
fact remains, who are you, what are your circumstances.
i wish you the best in your pursuit of health and a long life, but my stance in my original response stands on its own. just blidnly saying lc is the way to go is a no no. and if you start with a slant towards that premise then go digging for data to support it, you have done what is referred to in biostatistics , introuduced a research bias, which is very bad science.
ps btw, i think you're facing the right general direction on a g e's (advanced glycation end products) but mechanistically you're not quite there and what happens at the molecular level is hardly a decrease in 'elasticity'. again for general purposes your call sort of works in breif dicscussions in passing, but it is biochemically speaking, not so correct.