Last post wins!!!!!

[lostinidlewonder]

[liszt-and-the-galops]

*wins*

[ravelfan07]

Someone doesn't know how to use the Embed function. It's like having another Bob...

 

Eh

[liszt-and-the-galops]

*wins again*

[ravelfan07]

*wins again*

*wins*

[liszt-and-the-galops]

*wins*

try again.

*wins*

[transitional]

Scarlatti is pretty overrated tbh

Says someone who said the same thing about Schubert, so no reliability at all. (You do you though  )

[ravelfan07]

Says someone who said the same thing about Schubert, so no reliability at all. (You do you though  )

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Says someone who said the same thing about Schubert, so no reliability at all. (You do you though  )

He clearly only likes Ravel.

I don't care that it's an image of Stalin instead of Ravel, it was the top ****ing result when I searched "Maurice Ravel looking stupid" lmao.
Also 26 second response time.

[perfect_pitch]

*wins*

A good winner is humble...

I will take the win now...

[ravelfan07]

He clearly only likes Ravel.

I don't care that it's an image of Stalin instead of Ravel, it was the top ****ing result when I searched "Maurice Ravel looking stupid" lmao.
Also 26 second response time.

Sorry, can’t hear you over my Impressionism and romanticism superiority 😎

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Sorry, can’t hear you over my Impressionism and romanticism superiority 😎

Because you included impressionism, you included Liszt; and because you included Liszt, you included me.
And because you didn't include Bach, you're a fake musician.

[ravelfan07]

Because you included impressionism, you included Liszt; and because you included Liszt, you included me.
And because you didn't include Bach, you're a fake musician.

Liszt is awesome ngl
Bach is meh
Just not my style

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Liszt is awesome ngl
Bach is meh
Just not my style

you're a fake musician.

[perfect_pitch]

Liszt is awesome ngl
Bach is meh
Just not my style

I feel like me and ravelfan07 could of potentially bonded and be drinking mates if we knew each other in person...

...on the other hand he did say Scarlatti was overrated, so chances are we'd get into an argument at said pub and I'd probably end up glassing him.

[gasplamey]

I feel like me and ravelfan07 could of potentially bonded and be drinking mates if we knew each other in person...

...on the other hand he did say Scarlatti was overrated, so chances are we'd get into an argument at said pub and I'd probably end up glassing him.

Scarlatti is overrated.
I don't know what you're talking about.

[ravelfan07]

Scarlatti is overrated.
I don't know what you're talking about.

Real

[perfect_pitch]

Scarlatti is overrated.
I don't know what you're talking about.

Clearly you're a noob at piano.     

Scarlatti is intricate, but also not too overtly complex like some of Bach's 4 and sometimes 5 voices.

There's some Bach that I like - like his 2 and 3 part inventions, and some of his preludes are quite nice, but the concept of his fugues sometimes seems too conceited.

[frodo4]

Clearly you're a noob at piano.     

Scarlatti is intricate, but also not too overtly complex like some of Bach's 4 and sometimes 5 voices.

There's some Bach that I like - like his 2 and 3 part inventions, and some of his preludes are quite nice, but the concept of his fugues sometimes seems too conceited.

I agree with you on Scarlatti, but not on Bach.  I think I listened to all 555 Kirkpatrick numbered sonatas recorded by Scott Ross maybe 50+ times each.  50 * 30 hours = 1500 hours MINIMUM.

Have a listen to his cat fugue.  Not too complicated.  Just right.  Simple enough for a cat to play.

[frodo4]

What order do I listen to the 555 sonatas?  The same order that Ross recorded them:

K1, K2, K3, K4, K5, K6, K7, K8, K9, K10,
K11, K12, K13, K14, K15, K16, K17, K18, K19, K20,
K21, K22, K23, K24, K25, K26, K27, K28, K29, K30 = cat fugue
K31, K32, K33, K34, K35, K36, K37, K38, K39, K40,
K41, K42, K43, K44, K45, K46, K47, K48, K49, K50,
K51, K52, K53, K54, K55, K56, K57, K58, K59, K60,
K61, K62, K63, K64, K65, K66, K67, K68, K69, K70,
etc., etc., etc., etc, etc. for the most part
K551, K552, K553, K554, K555,
K81, K88, K89, K90, K91, K287, K288, K328 - All on last CD #34*. 

*-K81, K88, K89, K90, K91 are played as trio sonatas with basso continuo
K287, K288, K328 played on organ

[gasplamey]

I agree with you on Scarlatti, but not on Bach.  I think I listened to all 555 Kirkpatrick numbered sonatas recorded by Scott Ross maybe 50+ times each.  50 * 30 hours = 1500 hours MINIMUM.

Have a listen to his cat fugue.  Not too complicated.  Just right.  Simple enough for a cat to play.

I never said Bach was bad.
Scarlatti...
no.

[j_tour]

I've used lowercase since you mentioned that it should be spelled with lowercase, which was fairly quickly after I joined. The j and t are definitely not the same height as the o, u, and r.Most laughable response ever.

Well, then I apologize for mistaking you for a mere cretin.

Don't for a minute think that you will not perish.

Your kind always does.

Drink it all up, son.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Well, then I apologize for mistaking you for a mere cretin.

Don't for a minute think that you will perish.

Your kind never does.

Thanks!

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Also, if any of you have noticed, I now have the world record for response time (5 seconds).

[lostinidlewonder]

Also, if any of you have noticed, I now have the world record for response time (5 seconds).

[perfect_pitch]

Also, if any of you have noticed, I now have the world record for response time (5 seconds).

I doubt that... you want to highlight where you had said '5 second response time'?

[liszt-and-the-galops]

I doubt that... you want to highlight where you had said '5 second response time'?

Sure.

All the most recent posts are now either from Musical Madness or this.

Yes it does...

(it was in reference to a previous post about j_tour and courier font)
No modified timestamp tricks.
And if you're going to say "that doesn't count it was on second to last post wins," then you'll have revealed yourself as someone so full of himself that he can't even acknowledge that something he doesn't like counts and contorts himself into being able to claim that said thing doesn't exist.

[ravelfan07]

Sure.(it was in reference to a previous post about j_tour and courier font)
No modified timestamp tricks.
And if you're going to say "that doesn't count it was on second to last post wins," then you'll have revealed yourself as someone so full of himself that he can't even acknowledge that something he doesn't like counts and contorts himself into being able to claim that said thing doesn't exist.

Liszt being humble challenge (difficultly: impossible)

[gasplamey]

Liszt being humble challenge (difficultly: impossible)

What are you talking about.
That was the humblest of humbleness.
The humbleness was past the Sun.

[perfect_pitch]

And if you're going to say "that doesn't count it was on second to last post wins," then you'll have revealed yourself as someone so full of himself that he can't even acknowledge that something he doesn't like counts and contorts himself into being able to claim that said thing doesn't exist.

First of all - I wasn't going to try and dismiss it - I went through the last 2 pages of this thread and couldn't find any evidence of 5 second posts... unaware it was on a different thread.

Secondly... I'll give you credit. That's a hard record to have beaten. Give me time and I'll have that down to 4 second.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Secondly... I'll give you credit. That's a hard record to have beaten. Give me time and I'll have that down to 4 second.

Thank y-
Wait a minute, p_p giving credit to someone other than himself?

Where is the real perfect_pitch and what have you done with him?

[perfect_pitch]

Thank y-
Wait a minute, p_p giving credit to someone other than himself?

Where is the real perfect_pitch and what have you done with him?

First of all - again, you don't know the real me. You've been on this forum for not even 6 months. This thread has been going on for almost 11 years.

You barely know me. I've tipped my hat off to many people in this thread. I don't really care anyway - I still have the post from furthest into the future (2 billion years).

Gotta admit that was a creative one.

[j_tour]

Doesn't it take, like way under five seconds to suck an egg?

Gotta admit that was a creative one.

Sort of.  You had people guffawing at your sorcery for a second or so. An Earth-second, that is.



You do really well at keeping the troops in high spirits, though.  Show off them dancers' legs!  Don't be shy!  These are teenage boys....they don't know the difference!

[perfect_pitch]

You had people guffawing at your sorcery for a second or so. An Earth-second, that is.

I had people guffawed for quite a while, and that's one record you cannot beat.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

I still have the post from furthest into the future (2 billion years).

Yours was at 4 pm. The one I made recently (two pages ago I think) was at 11:59 pm and 59 seconds.
I win.
Edit: found it. Post 16,444.

If you still aren't convinced, go check your quote on the 2nd page and despair as you realize I outdid you a mere 1 second before the end of time.

[j_tour]

[perfect_pitch]

If you still aren't convinced, go check your quote on the 2nd page and despair as you realize I outdid you a mere 1 second before the end of time.

I'm not convinced... your timedate states:

Quote from: liszt-and-the-galops on January 01, -2147483648, 07:59:59 AM

Your timestamp has a NEGATIVE in front of it... meaning that the post is 2 billion years before our current present place in the timeline...

Impressive as it is, it still doesn't count. It's the LAST POST wins, and my timestamp is 4 BILLION years after your quote, and the furthest point in the timeline.

Weep at your trivial but pathetic mistake...

[j_tour]

[liszt-and-the-galops]

I'm not convinced... your timedate states:

Quote from: liszt-and-the-galops on January 01, -2147483648, 07:59:59 AM

Your timestamp has a NEGATIVE in front of it... meaning that the post is 2 billion years before our current present place in the timeline...

Impressive as it is, it still doesn't count. It's the LAST POST wins, and my timestamp is 4 BILLION years after your quote, and the furthest point in the timeline.

Go look at it again, p_p.
Never edited it, and yet the date is positive:
Quote from: liszt-and-the-galops on December 31, 2147483647, 11:59:59 PM
Either you misread, or you just made it up.

Weep at your trivial but pathetic mistake...

no u.

Edit: Okay, I did some thinking. My conclusion is that we're both right.
Assuming that your pianostreet user profile's location is where you actually are, you're in Perth, Australia, which follows Australian Western Standard Time, or GMT+8. I'm in New Jersey, which currently follows US Eastern daylight time, of GMT-4. The difference between what it looks like on my end (11:59 for my quote, 3:59 for yours) and on yours (7:59 for my quote, presumably 11:59 for yours) is exactly 8 hours.
Basically, time zone shenanigans are messing with everything, we both have a quote from the end of time, but it doesn't look like it to the other person because we live 12 hours apart.

If my theory is correct, then the quote above, which for me comes out like this:

Quote from: liszt-and-the-galops on December 31, 2147483647, 11:59:59 PM
Quote from: perfect_pitch on January 01, -2147483648, 12:00:00 AM

should end up on your end looking like this:

Quote from: liszt-and-the-galops on January 01, -2147483647, 7:59:59 AM
Quote from: perfect_pitch on January 01, -2147483648, 8:00:00 AM

Is this correct?

[j_tour]

[liszt-and-the-galops]

What the **** does that have to do with the difference in time between New Jersey and Perth?

[perfect_pitch]

Edit: Okay, I did some thinking. My conclusion is that we're both right.
Assuming that your pianostreet user profile's location is where you actually are, you're in Perth, Australia, which follows Australian Western Standard Time, or GMT+8. I'm in New Jersey, which currently follows US Eastern daylight time, of GMT-4. The difference between what it looks like on my end (11:59 for my quote, 3:59 for yours) and on yours (7:59 for my quote, presumably 11:59 for yours) is exactly 8 hours.
Basically, time zone shenanigans are messing with everything, we both have a quote from the end of time, but it doesn't look like it to the other person because we live 12 hours apart.

If my theory is correct, then the quote above, which for me comes out like this:

Quote from: liszt-and-the-galops on December 31, 2147483647, 11:59:59 PM
Quote from: perfect_pitch on January 01, -2147483648, 12:00:00 AM

should end up on your end looking like this:

Quote from: liszt-and-the-galops on January 01, -2147483647, 7:59:59 AM
Quote from: perfect_pitch on January 01, -2147483648, 8:00:00 AM

Is this correct?

Kudos to you - you accomplished what I did 11 years ago.



Also... nice try on the duplicate thread. Looks like it won't be of use to you, any more. Nils shut your arse down faster than you could fart.   

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Kudos to you - you accomplished what I did 11 years ago.

I also did what you couldn't and solved the mystery (and made a quote from as far back as possible).

Also... nice try on the duplicate thread. Looks like it won't be of use to you, any more. Nils shut your arse down faster than you could fart.   

Another fail by you...
I shut it down myself on purpose.
You'll see later.

[lostinidlewonder]

I think this thread is inducing psychosis amongst some of you.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

I think this thread is inducing psychosis amongst some of you.

(I don't care that that's the exact image you used lol)

[lostinidlewonder]

(I don't care that that's the exact image you used lol)

Well, I don't care that you broke your elbow.

[perfect_pitch]

I also did what you couldn't and solved the mystery (and made a quote from as far back as possible).Another fail by you...

Okay - you solved the mystery - congrats to you. I also knew how to do the minus timestamp. You merely add a single integer to your timestamp and it instantly takes you to the first possible second in the forums calculations.

Not exactly that hard. I CHOSE not to do it because who cares about a timestamp 4 billion years ago... I bring you back to my prior argument:

It's the last post wins - who cares about a post 4 billion years ago?

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Not exactly that hard. I CHOSE not to do it because who cares about a timestamp 4 billion years ago... I bring you back to my prior argument:

You still didn't do it, so it's still a first.
As for who cares...
What if someone (somehow) took the time to backdate every single post to the earliest possible instant? There's no way in h*ll that it would happen, but pretend it did...
We'd all be p*ssed off, that's for sure.

[lostinidlewonder]

A Pomeranian from Wisconsin, holds a Guinness World Record for the longest recorded yawn at 23 minutes and 8 seconds.

[perfect_pitch]

You still didn't do it, so it's still a first.

I guess... kudos to you.

I wonder if I'll get the 2^¹⁵th post in the next 10 years. Took us 10 years to get to 2^¹⁴th post...