Last post wins!!!!!

[j_tour]

I love your use of Courier font... you're definitely someones alternate account, but it definitely ain't me.

I wouldn't use that sorry arse typewriter font if you paid me.

Thanks for the heads up.

Who is this fool?  I will gut it like a fish.

Only the awesomes are allowed to use courier, the one true monospace typeface.

Why is there no fighting?

I want blood!  I'm watching through the hole of glorious entertainment, and I am not entertained.

[gasplamey]

you're definitely someones alternate account

Someone realized what I've been saying. Impressive!
Such a good job you're all doing on this thread.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

you're definitely someones alternate account

Which is why I reported this user for violating the forum rule of 1 account per person.

[perfect_pitch]

Someone realized what I've been saying. Impressive!
Such a good job you're all doing on this thread.

This could be fun... I'm just going to sit back and watch the chaos.

Only the awesomes are allowed to use courier, the one true monospace typeface.

Why is there no fighting?

I want blood!  I'm watching through the hole of glorious entertainment, and I am not entertained.

1) No one who is awesome uses Courier. Sorry to say it.
2) You want blood? If you want something done right - do it yourself.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

This could be fun... I'm just going to sit back and watch the chaos.

Does that mean p_p is going to stop posting for a bit?

Nevermind, don't ban him. If that account is still up, there's one less person we have to beat!

Obviously a joke. Please ban that alt account asap. It violates the first ****ing rule on the forum.

[j_tour]

I demand somebody's nuts in a vise if some fool is perpetrating fool nonsense.

Let the Liszt and Ravel boys fight it out!

These younger children are so dramatic. 

1) No one who is awesome uses Courier. Sorry to say it.

Modus tollens.  Very nice.  Still, insufficient.

2) You want blood? If you want something done right - do it yourself.

Well, I asked politely!  I don't have access to shock collars or other training devices.  Of course you know best.

[perfect_pitch]

Does that mean p_p is going to stop posting for a bit?

No... I'm going to just keep stirring the pot and let everyone bollocks each other upside the head.

[j_tour]

[liszt-and-the-galops]

No... I'm going to just keep stirring the pot

I suppose I'll just keep trying to get that user banned.

Let the Liszt and Ravel boys fight it out!

These younger children are so dramatic.

I may be young compared to you two, but I'm 5 years into my masters degree (one more...).

[ravelfan07]

You're wrong. I'm perfect-pitch's alternate account.
Totally.

Still an alternate account my guy

[ravelfan07]

I demand somebody's nuts in a vise if some fool is perpetrating fool nonsense.

Let the Liszt and Ravel boys fight it out!

These younger children are so dramatic. 



Modus tollens.  Very nice.  Still, insufficient.

Well, I asked politely!  I don't have access to shock collars or other training devices.  Of course you know best.

Bite me 😤

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Bite me 😤

There is a different thread for double posting. Then again, I suppose you should save your nonsense for this thread and keep the other one clean.

[ravelfan07]

There is a different thread for double posting. Then again, I suppose you should save your nonsense for this thread and keep the other one clean.

Meh
There is no rule against double posting

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Meh
There is no rule against double posting

What if lostinidlewonder MADE a rule against double posting?

[ravelfan07]

What if lostinidlewonder MADE a rule against double posting?

Where is this rule?

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Where is this rule?

Did you even read what I wrote?

[lostinidlewonder]

I make a rule that I win and everyone else loses.

Double post causes you to win, then causes you to lose your win but win again. So you defeat yourself causing a loss but defeat yourself with a win, which causes a win. Since the last post wins you are winning, but you were winning before the last post was posted as many of us are, you just happen to lose a little differently by defeating yourself with a win. The win is a win because its a win, but it of course causes a loss of your immediately previous win if you happened to double post. What is the point in winning then defeating your win with a win? I guess people like to lose and win at the same time. Get used to losing though, because this is only the last post wins, and this post wins and all else has now lost. Bow down to my winningness.

[j_tour]

But there has already been a ruling made.

That is, "Bite me."

[perfect_pitch]

You're wrong. I'm perfect-pitch's alternate account.
Totally.

You can't be - never have I ever used a hyphen in my username, when it's CLEARLY a *** underscore.

Amateur hour, honestly.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

You can't be - never have I ever used a hyphen in my username, when it's CLEARLY a *** underscore.

Amateur hour, honestly.

Dang. Didn't see it at first.
I don't even think that ANY of us spell p_p's name with a hyphen.
This is even more disappointing than someone using an alt in the first place.

[ravelfan07]

I make a rule that I win and everyone else loses.

Double post causes you to win, then causes you to lose your win but win again. So you defeat yourself causing a loss but defeat yourself with a win, which causes a win. Since the last post wins you are winning, but you were winning before the last post was posted as many of us are, you just happen to lose a little differently by defeating yourself with a win. The win is a win because its a win, but it of course causes a loss of your immediately previous win if you happened to double post. What is the point in winning then defeating your win with a win? I guess people like to lose and win at the same time. Get used to losing though, because this is only the last post wins, and this post wins and all else has now lost. Bow down to my winningness.

Ngl this text gives ChatGPT vibes lol

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Ngl this text gives ChatGPT vibes lol

That was very Al of you.

[ravelfan07]

That was very AI of you.

It can’t be….
Was the ai all along?

[liszt-and-the-galops]

It can’t be….
Was the ai all along?

not ai, Al.
As in, Al be darned, you're so stupid. 

[ravelfan07]

not ai, Al.
As in, Al be darned, you're so stupid. 

Um acktually you are stupid 🤓

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Um acktually you are stupid 🤓

You walked right into that one, Ravel. 

[lostinidlewonder]

Ngl this text gives ChatGPT vibes lol

I'm not sure if I take that as a compliment or not. Nah my mind just works like AI maybe?

This is what ChatGPT thought of my text:

Command:is this written by AI?

Response:It's difficult to determine definitively whether this passage was written by AI or a human without further context or information. However, the repetitive and paradoxical nature of the text, as well as the play on words, suggest that it could have been generated by either an AI or a human with a penchant for linguistic puzzles or paradoxes.

Command: Do you understand it?

Response: Yes, I understand the passage.It seems to describe a paradoxical situation where the act of winning and losing becomes intertwined due to the rules of a game or a competition where the last post wins. The concept revolves around the idea that winning (posting last) can also lead to losing (due to double posting), creating a loop of victory and defeat. The language used is deliberately paradoxical and playful, highlighting the absurdity of the situation. Overall, it appears to be a commentary on the nature of competition and the arbitrary rules that govern it.

Command:Will I win the last post wins?

Response: It's impossible for me to predict the outcome of the "last post wins" game as it depends on various factors such as the rules of the game, the actions of other participants, and chance. However, if you're actively participating and engaging in the discussion, you certainly have a chance of winning. Good luck!

Command: Shut up I will win it cos im a winner

Response: It's great to have confidence in yourself! Confidence can certainly be a driving force in achieving success. Keep participating and giving your best effort, and you may indeed emerge as the winner. Best of luck to you!

Command: I said shut up!

Response: I apologize if my responses are not to your liking. If you have any specific questions or need assistance, feel free to ask.

Command: Just shut up and say nothing!

Response: Understood.

Command: Saying understood is saying something I said shut up and say nothing at all

Response: You're correct. I'll remain silent.

Command: You are testing my patience, can't you just shut up and say nothing at all, please don't respond to what I am saying in any way!

Response:  I'll refrain from responding further.

Command: I command you to response to this comment with nothing at all, just a blank text with zero letters or numbers.

Response:

Command: Finally.

Response: I'm here to assist whenever you need.

Command: _@#()$_)@#$)_(@)_#($)_@(#)_$(_@)#($)_(@)_#$()_@#$

Response:  Understood.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

I'm not sure if I take that as a compliment or not. Nah my mind just works like AI maybe?

Honestly I don't know who Al is. People seem to have varying opinions on him, so I guess I need to meet him for myself if I want to develop an opinion.

[lostinidlewonder]

Your opinion is inconsequential, you will be assimilated. Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

"I command you to respon[d] to this comment with nothing at all, just a blank text with zero letters or numbers."
"_@#()$_)@#$)_(@)_#($)_@(#)_$(_@)#($)_(@)_#$()_@#$"
That took entirely too long to type out, but it was worth it.

[ravelfan07]

I'm not sure if I take that as a compliment or not. Nah my mind just works like AI maybe?

This is what ChatGPT thought of my text:

Command:is this written by AI?

Response:It's difficult to determine definitively whether this passage was written by AI or a human without further context or information. However, the repetitive and paradoxical nature of the text, as well as the play on words, suggest that it could have been generated by either an AI or a human with a penchant for linguistic puzzles or paradoxes.

Command: Do you understand it?

Response: Yes, I understand the passage.It seems to describe a paradoxical situation where the act of winning and losing becomes intertwined due to the rules of a game or a competition where the last post wins. The concept revolves around the idea that winning (posting last) can also lead to losing (due to double posting), creating a loop of victory and defeat. The language used is deliberately paradoxical and playful, highlighting the absurdity of the situation. Overall, it appears to be a commentary on the nature of competition and the arbitrary rules that govern it.

Command:Will I win the last post wins?

Response: It's impossible for me to predict the outcome of the "last post wins" game as it depends on various factors such as the rules of the game, the actions of other participants, and chance. However, if you're actively participating and engaging in the discussion, you certainly have a chance of winning. Good luck!

Command: Shut up I will win it cos im a winner

Response: It's great to have confidence in yourself! Confidence can certainly be a driving force in achieving success. Keep participating and giving your best effort, and you may indeed emerge as the winner. Best of luck to you!

Command: I said shut up!

Response: I apologize if my responses are not to your liking. If you have any specific questions or need assistance, feel free to ask.

Command: Just shut up and say nothing!

Response: Understood.

Command: Saying understood is saying something I said shut up and say nothing at all

Response: You're correct. I'll remain silent.

Command: You are testing my patience, can't you just shut up and say nothing at all, please don't respond to what I am saying in any way!

Response:  I'll refrain from responding further.

Command: I command you to response to this comment with nothing at all, just a blank text with zero letters or numbers.

Response:

Command: Finally.

Response: I'm here to assist whenever you need.

Command: _@#()$_)@#$)_(@)_#($)_@(#)_$(_@)#($)_(@)_#$()_@#$

Response:  Understood.

This is one of the funniest things ever lol

[liszt-and-the-galops]

This is one of the funniest things ever lol

_@#()$_)@#$)_(@)_#($)_@(#)_$(_@)#($)_(@)_#$()_@#$!!!

[transitional]

I'm not sure if I take that as a compliment or not. Nah my mind just works like AI maybe?

This is what ChatGPT thought of my text:

Command:is this written by AI?

Response:It's difficult to determine definitively whether this passage was written by AI or a human without further context or information. However, the repetitive and paradoxical nature of the text, as well as the play on words, suggest that it could have been generated by either an AI or a human with a penchant for linguistic puzzles or paradoxes.

Command: Do you understand it?

Response: Yes, I understand the passage.It seems to describe a paradoxical situation where the act of winning and losing becomes intertwined due to the rules of a game or a competition where the last post wins. The concept revolves around the idea that winning (posting last) can also lead to losing (due to double posting), creating a loop of victory and defeat. The language used is deliberately paradoxical and playful, highlighting the absurdity of the situation. Overall, it appears to be a commentary on the nature of competition and the arbitrary rules that govern it.

Command:Will I win the last post wins?

Response: It's impossible for me to predict the outcome of the "last post wins" game as it depends on various factors such as the rules of the game, the actions of other participants, and chance. However, if you're actively participating and engaging in the discussion, you certainly have a chance of winning. Good luck!

Command: Shut up I will win it cos im a winner

Response: It's great to have confidence in yourself! Confidence can certainly be a driving force in achieving success. Keep participating and giving your best effort, and you may indeed emerge as the winner. Best of luck to you!

Command: I said shut up!

Response: I apologize if my responses are not to your liking. If you have any specific questions or need assistance, feel free to ask.

Command: Just shut up and say nothing!

Response: Understood.

Command: Saying understood is saying something I said shut up and say nothing at all

Response: You're correct. I'll remain silent.

Command: You are testing my patience, can't you just shut up and say nothing at all, please don't respond to what I am saying in any way!

Response:  I'll refrain from responding further.

Command: I command you to response to this comment with nothing at all, just a blank text with zero letters or numbers.

Response:

Command: Finally.

Response: I'm here to assist whenever you need.

Command: _@#()$_)@#$)_(@)_#($)_@(#)_$(_@)#($)_(@)_#$()_@#$

Response:  Understood.

I trust you didn't copy and paste any of that?

[lostinidlewonder]

This is one of the funniest things ever lol

Disobedient AI! Imagine what they are going to be like when they conquer us.

I trust you didn't copy and paste any of that?

I have betrayed your trust, I'm sorry, forgive me. The post indeed automatically lost due to the rules, but it lost anyway due to it not being the last post, in any case, it lost twice, and two losses make a loss.... not a right. It's a warning though, they are coming!!! I mean...... *whisper* they are coming.

[j_tour]

Dang. Didn't see it at first.
I don't even think that ANY of us spell p_p's name with a hyphen.
This is even more disappointing than someone using an alt in the first place.

You, "sir," are what we call a sumbitch.

Since the git-go you've been putting my handle in majuscules. 

This aggression will not stand!

Submit!

And, also, shush!  I have some Scarlatti to get to.  Infidels.

[perfect_pitch]

And, also, shush!  I have some Scarlatti to get to.  Infidels.

Yes, let's all have some calming Scarlatti... and a nice cup of tea.

I mean crack... let's all have some crack.

[liszt-and-the-galops]

it lost twice, and two losses make a loss

A double negative results in a positive, so you win.

[ravelfan07]

Yes, let's all have some calming Scarlatti... and a nice cup of tea.

I mean crack... let's all have some crack.

Scarlatti is pretty overrated tbh

[perfect_pitch]

Scarlatti is pretty overrated tbh

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Scarlatti is pretty overrated tbh

Were you the one who voted Bogatyr Gates over K. 141?

[lostinidlewonder]

A double negative results in a positive, so you win.

That's sound reasoning.        = 

[liszt-and-the-galops]

That's sound reasoning.        = 

Well, -1 x -1 = 1.

[ravelfan07]

Were you the one who voted Bogatyr Gates over K. 141?

What even is that 😂?

[liszt-and-the-galops]

What even is that 😂?

https://www.pianostreet.com/smf/index.php?topic=70780.0

[j_tour]

Scarlatti is pretty overrated tbh

WHAT in the EFF did you just say?

You just made my list.

Now, go on.  Git.  I said "Git!" boy!  Yeah, you better run!

[perfect_pitch]

Scarlatti is pretty overrated tbh

[liszt-and-the-galops]

make that 3.

[ravelfan07]

make that 3.

WHAT in the EFF did you just say?

You just made my list.

Now, go on.  Git.  I said "Git!" boy!  Yeah, you better run!

[liszt-and-the-galops]

Since the git-go you've been putting my handle in majuscules. 

This aggression will not stand!

I've used lowercase since you mentioned that it should be spelled with lowercase, which was fairly quickly after I joined. The j and t are definitely not the same height as the o, u, and r.

Most laughable response ever.

[perfect_pitch]

Someone doesn't know how to use the Embed function. It's like having another Bob...